Posts Tagged ‘machine’


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” – 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution

With Puppet in Chief and “””””constitutional scholar””””” Obama (Sorry, one set of quotes wasn’t enough) threatening more gun control measures I figured I’d write a quick and dirty blog post about how ANY gun law, regulation, restriction, ban, etc…. is completely and totally unconstitutional and should be ignored. The BATFE in itself is a completely unconstitutional organization as EVERYTHING they do is 110% contrary to the 2nd amendment of the Constitution of these United States. Let me explain…

Let’s delve into the wording of the 2nd amendment shall we….

Well regulated. Many people use this as their proof text for gun regulations but in reality it is nothing of the sort. This phrase simply means regulated from within so it doesn’t require regulation from without. So the militia is to be controlled internally, but not as far as guns are concerned as we’ll talk about in a minute. It speaks more about individual militia structure than anything else.

Necessary. That means it is 100% necessary for the people to be armed to have a free state.

Free state. That is a state (not a country by the way), a locality, a land mass, that is free. Freedom is the absence of restrictions of any kind, including gun restrictions.

Militia. This one is easy. The amendment defines this word as “the people”. Ya, that’s everyone. However, more specifically it’s the people defending the country or just their town against tyrannical governments.

The right. Notice that doesn’t say the privilege granted by government. It almost infers duty now doesn’t it.

The people. That would be everyone. Since we’re in a separate sentence now it’s talking about the people as the collective and/or singular. Either way it’s everybody.

Keep. That means “retain”, “possess”, etc… in other words it can’t be taken away.

Bear. That means also to “possess” but goes further into words like “carry” and “use”.

Arms. This word means any weapon. That includes, but is not limited to ALL firearms, even suppressed full auto assault rifles with high capacity magazines full of armor piercing incendiary rounds. Things such as rocket launchers, grenades, tanks, knives, swords, nunchucks etc are all defined as Arms. If it wasn’t for Search Engine Optimization the title of this post would have said “all weapon regulations”…. Either way when the 2nd amendment was written it was meant to include ALL weapons of war. That’s right! Private citizens should be allowed to freely possess and use any weapon that the most elite special forces soldier possesses. NO EXCEPTIONS!

Shall not. Notice this doesn’t say “pursuant to”, or, “except in the case of”, or, “except for”, etc… Shall not is simply that. You can’t do it.

Infringed. That means to limit, restrict, regulate or violate. In other words this right can’t be violated OR RESTRICTED or limited in any way, shape or form. So, gun regulations (or knife, sword, etc…) are infringements on your constitutionally protected rights.

The constitution is the supreme law of the land and according to the 9th and 10th amendment’s (quoted below) the feds and states MAY NOT add any more weapons regulations since the constitution mentions it. Constitutional supremacy rules here. That also means they may not regulate the production or sale of said weapons. No state concealed carry license is over the Constitution. No gun ban of any kind is above the Constitution. Any politician talking about, proposing or passing gun regulations of any kind ought to be tried and executed for high treason against the Constitution of these United States.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” – 9th Amendment to the US Constitution

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” – 10th Amendment to the US Constitution

All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. (Marbury vs.Madison, 1803.)

You know what, if you want my guns that bad you can have my guns… But be warned they come bullets first!



Oh, this ought to piss some people off… Just hear me out ok. Let me start off by saying I’m not a neo-Nazi, skinhead, jew hater or anything along those lines. What I am is someone who is interested in TRUTH. And if I have learned anything in my quest of truth it’s that you NEVER TRUST THE OFFICIAL STORY!

The holocaust is the mother of all conspiracies. It eclipses 911 like a mountain eclipses an ant. It’s common knowledge in the truther / conspiracy community that the Reichstag’s Fire was a false flag so if you consider yourself someone who wants the truth about everything (like myself) you’ll investigate anything honestly and without per-conceived notions. The story of the holocaust has always not sat right with me. I didn’t know why, just a hunch. So, as the indigo in me wouldn’t let it go I decided to dive into some research. This is only 1 book out of lots I have read on the subject and by far this book is the most detailed and CONCISE I have read.

So onto the meat of it. Did 6 million jews die at the hands of the Nazi concentrations camps? To my understanding, Hell No. First one must realize that the concentration camps were NOT extermination camps, they were forced labor camps. They had hospitals, showers (which weren’t gassing chambers), orchestras, nurseries, sports and yes, hard labor. I, and this book alike don’t claim the camps didn’t exist but this book sheds light on some of the more controversial parts.